BETAThis is a new independent transparency project, not an official government website. The data is sourced from public registers and may contain errors, so always verify against the official source. If you find a problem, please report it here.
Provision of community equipment services, and business services in support of a public sector mutual
| Supplier | Identifier | Award Value | Lots Won | Cross-References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ainsty Timber Marketing | 01457867 | - | - | - |
| Arbcore Ltd | 07958917 | - | - | - |
| Edwards Woodland | 03953029 | - | - | - |
| Forest Tree Surgery & Grounds Maintenance Ltd | 15147681 | - | - | - |
| Jimmy Hughes Services Ltd | 04855768 | - | - | - |
| Lampeter Tree Services | 04259132 | - | - | - |
| Nant Conwy Tree Services | - | - | - | - |
| Nant Tree Services | 10136616 | - | - | - |
| Pitchford tree services | - | - | - | - |
| Provide Community Interest Company | 07320006 | ~£42,000,000 estimated from lot values | 1 lot Lot 1 | - |
| Sherratt Landscape Contractors Ltd | 05404164 | - | - | - |
| Spencer Quantum Ltd | 02928764 | - | - | - |
| The Arb Team | - | - | - | - |
This procurement was divided into 1 lots, each awarded separately. 1 bids were received in total.
| Lot | Value | Bids Received | Awarded To | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lot 1 2,520 days (≈6.9 yrs) | £42,000,000 | 1 single bid — no competition | Provide Community Interest Company | active |
Weightings from the notice.
Government spending data: These suppliers have received £9,153,518 in 635 payments (over £25k) from Department for Transport, Welsh Government, DEFRA, Forestry Commission, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust and 2 more public bodies (2019-04-30 to 2025-10-28).
Changes the buyer published to this notice after it first appeared.
The changes noted above reflect the Council’s intentions for this procurement, which were omitted from the drafting of the original contract award notice. In particular: - the value of the Services Limb (as reflected in the procurement documents and underlying third party contracts) is £190,000,000, rather than the figure of £42,000,000 included at sections II.1.7 and V.2.4 of the original contract award notice; and- in addition to this, the Council intended that sufficient "headroom" (£136,000,000) be made available in order that other public bodies can make use of the Framework and that the Potentially Transferring Hosted Contracts can be delivered under the Framework. Without this financial headroom, the Framework Limb would have had no effect. The £82,000,000 allocated to the Framework Limb in respect of the Potentially Transferring Hosted Contracts is not "new business", but existing services valued under the Services Limb that (potentially) could transfer to the Framework Limb.The procurement documents were clear that the Council was procuring a framework agreement capable of being used by other public bodies. However, as noted above, a specific value for Framework Limb was not included in the original contract award notice; and the contract award notice did not include an explicit reference to third party access to the Framework. The procurement documents also made clear that the Framework was to be accessible by any local authority or public body in the United Kingdom, but this was not expressed in IV.1.3 of the original contract award notice.This Corrigendum rectifies these deficiencies in the original contract award notice.
The changes noted above reflect the Council’s intentions for this procurement, which were omitted from the drafting of the original contract award notice. In particular: - the value of the Services Limb (as reflected in the procurement documents and underlying third party contracts) is £190,000,000, rather than the figure of £42,000,000 included at sections II.1.7 and V.2.4 of the original contract award notice; and- in addition to this, the Council intended that sufficient "headroom" (£136,000,000) be made available in order that other public bodies can make use of the Framework and that the Potentially Transferring Hosted Contracts can be delivered under the Framework. Without this financial headroom, the Framework Limb would have had no effect. The £82,000,000 allocated to the Framework Limb in respect of the Potentially Transferring Hosted Contracts is not "new business", but existing services valued under the Services Limb that (potentially) could transfer to the Framework Limb.The procurement documents were clear that the Council was procuring a framework agreement capable of being used by other public bodies. However, as noted above, a specific value for Framework Limb was not included in the original contract award notice; and the contract award notice did not include an explicit reference to third party access to the Framework. The procurement documents also made clear that the Framework was to be accessible by any local authority or public body in the United Kingdom, but this was not expressed in IV.1.3 of the original contract award notice.This Corrigendum rectifies these deficiencies in the original contract award notice.
The changes noted above reflect the Council’s intentions for this procurement, which were omitted from the drafting of the original contract award notice. In particular: - the value of the Services Limb (as reflected in the procurement documents and underlying third party contracts) is £190,000,000, rather than the figure of £42,000,000 included at sections II.1.7 and V.2.4 of the original contract award notice; and- in addition to this, the Council intended that sufficient "headroom" (£136,000,000) be made available in order that other public bodies can make use of the Framework and that the Potentially Transferring Hosted Contracts can be delivered under the Framework. Without this financial headroom, the Framework Limb would have had no effect. The £82,000,000 allocated to the Framework Limb in respect of the Potentially Transferring Hosted Contracts is not "new business", but existing services valued under the Services Limb that (potentially) could transfer to the Framework Limb.The procurement documents were clear that the Council was procuring a framework agreement capable of being used by other public bodies. However, as noted above, a specific value for Framework Limb was not included in the original contract award notice; and the contract award notice did not include an explicit reference to third party access to the Framework. The procurement documents also made clear that the Framework was to be accessible by any local authority or public body in the United Kingdom, but this was not expressed in IV.1.3 of the original contract award notice.This Corrigendum rectifies these deficiencies in the original contract award notice.
Published by the buyer on this notice. Details change and are not updated here.