Loading contract…
BETAThis is a new independent transparency project, not an official government website. The data is sourced from public registers and may contain errors, so always verify against the official source. If you find a problem, please report it here.
Zero additional value extensions to the contract extending the expiry date as below:<br/><br/>5th September 2023 to 31st March 2024<br/><br/>These were an extension of time only to allow for project delays via Reg 72.—(1) (e) where the modifications, irrespective of their value, are not substantial<br/><br/>This is a delayed publication of the modification as there was a discrepancy between the Atamis record which allowed for extensions and the original Contract Award Notice that had not allowed for the extensions, meaning it was mistakenly assumed to be an allowable Reg 72 that did not require a revised Notice
| Supplier | Identifier | Award Value | Lots Won | Cross-References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basis Research Limited | 03211544 | - | 1 lot Lot 1 | - |
This procurement was divided into 1 lots, each awarded separately. 4 bids were received in total.
| Lot | Value | Bids Received | Awarded To | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lot 1 | £1,200,000 initial term | 4 | Basis Research Limited | active |
Weightings from the notice.
Government spending data: This supplier has received £1,564,183 in 29 payments (over £25k) from UK Health Security Agency, Department for Work and Pensions, Food Standards Agency, NHS England, Greater London Authority and 2 more public bodies (2020-03-04 to 2024-12-03). View full payment history →
Changes the buyer published to this notice after it first appeared.
Zero additional value extensions to the contract extending the expiry date as below:5th September 2023 to 31st March 2024These were an extension of time only to allow for project delays via Reg 72.—(1) (e) where the modifications, irrespective of their value, are not substantialThis is a delayed publication of the modification as there was a discrepancy between the Atamis record which allowed for extensions and the original Contract Award Notice that had not allowed for the extensions, meaning it was mistakenly assumed to be an allowable Reg 72 that did not require a revised Notice