BETAThis is a new independent transparency project, not an official government website. The data is sourced from public registers and may contain errors, so always verify against the official source. If you find a problem, please report it here.
Please read ITT for full information.
Evaluation requirements for 2 major projects conducted by WWF-UK, RSPB and National Trust.
The evaluation should follow the OECD DAC Quality Standards for Development Evaluation and should address some or all seven fundamental criteria (to be decided by implementing partners):
⢠Relevance and Quality of Design
⢠Coherence (assessment of alignment, synergy and compatibility of interventions)
⢠Efficiency (of delivery of outputs)
⢠Effectiveness (of delivery of intermediate results and outcomes)
⢠Impact (against the targets of the Plan)
⢠Sustainability (of progress, benefits, and impact realised)
⢠Adaptive Capacity (monitoring, evaluation, adaptation, and learning)
The evaluator must also:
⢠Create an evaluation framework and, more specifically, the evaluation matrices to score key project outcomes. Consideration must be given to our existing logical frameworks.
⢠Agree data collection and reporting methodologies.
⢠Ensure the collation of both qualitative and quantitative data from a wide range of stakeholders and sources, including Social Listening.
⢠Conduct case studies and focus groups with relevant people/organisations involved.â¯
⢠Ensure key stakeholders from all three charities teams across all four nations of the UK are involved in the creation of the evaluation framework and have the opportunity to provide feedback
No supplier information available.